The document, dated June 17 and signed by acting CTO Justin Fanelli, noted the need to “accelerate the adoption of game changing commercial technology.”

The list of priorities “can help shape resource allocation decisions across the enterprise,” he wrote, adding that it should serve as a “signaling tool” to industry partners and private capital to inform how they allocate their resources and focus their efforts.

Artificial intelligence and autonomy top the list of “Level 1” technologies in the hierarchy.

“AI and autonomy play a vital role in information warfare by enabling decision advantage and enhancing the ability of human-machine teaming. The DON seeks AI-driven solutions for real-time data analysis and automated decision-making to enhance operational effectiveness,” Fanelli wrote.

Level 2 technologies under this category include capabilities like applied machine learning and natural language processing; model verification and AI risk governance; mission platforms and human-machine interfaces; and edge AI infrastructure and DevSecOps pipelines.

Next on the list is quantum tech, which Fanelli said will transform secure communications, computing and sensing for information warfare. He noted that quantum encryption could protect the department’s networks from adversaries, and quantum computing would boost data processing and cryptographic resilience.

Level 2 technologies in this area include tools such as post-quantum cryptography and quantum-enhanced communication; hybrid quantum-classical architectures; quantum gravimetry and inertial navigation; and “quantum interconnects and cryogenic systems.”

“Transport and connectivity” are third on the list. According to Fanelli’s memo, the Navy is prioritizing advanced networking, secure communications, 5G and FutureG tech to enable real-time data sharing and command and control.

Level 2 technologies under this category include things like 5G and FutureG nodes and mesh architectures; dynamic spectrum sharing and anti-jamming techniques; datalinks and “ship-to-X” mesh networks; and cloudlets and intelligent routing.

Fourth on the list is command, control, communications, computers, cyber, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance — also known as C5ISR — as well as counter-C5ISR and space capabilities.

“The DON seeks to integrate advanced sensor networks, improve automated data fusion, and develop resilient space-based architectures to support real-time intelligence gathering,” Fanelli wrote.

Level 2 technologies in this area include capabilities such as multi-INT engines and automated targeting; operational pictures and targeting algorithms; hybrid constellations and positioning, navigation and timing (PNT) from space; and open architectures and multi-coalition information sharing.

Fifth on the list is tech related to cyberspace operations and zero trust.

“Cyber threats are evolving rapidly, making Zero Trust Architecture essential for securing DON information networks. Priorities include advanced cyber defense frameworks, threat intelligence automation, and proactive security measures to counter adversarial cyber operations,” per the memo.

Level 2 capabilities under this category include things like identity and access management — such as attribute-based access control and federated identity systems — micro segmentation and risk-adaptive controls for zero trust, cyber threat hunting and deception, and operational technology (OT) security — such as industrial control system and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) protection and remote access.

The complete list of tech priorities for Levels 1, 2 and 3 can be found here.

“A lot of these areas are mainly being driven by commercial tech,” Deputy CTO Michael Frank said in an interview. “It’s going to be a mix of … traditional defense vendors, traditional primes. But you know, we are really focused on getting some new entrants in, right? So, expanding the defense industrial base, getting some new players on the field. And this is a signal to them. This memo is meant to be a signal to them and what we’re focused on, what our priorities areas are, so they can better make decisions … If you’re an entrepreneur in this area or if you’re a VC who’s looking to invest, you know these are the general areas that we’re looking at.”

The Navy is looking to cast a wide net for new capabilities.

“We’re going to be looking at emerging tech from anybody and everyone who is operating in these areas and developing things in these areas, to include the other players in the defense innovation ecosystem. So, you know, looking at what DIU is doing, partnering with In-Q-Tel and what they are doing, because we want to make sure that we have awareness of all the various efforts across government to reduce waste, to reduce redundant spend, reduce redundant efforts, given the fact that we are operating in a resource-constrained environment, both with money and with people and time and effort and all of that,” Frank said.

The CTO’s office is aiming to accelerate the transition of key capabilities to the Navy and Marine Corps.

“We are absolutely more interested in higher [technology readiness levels],” Frank said. “We are more focused on things that we can start testing, validating and transitioning to the warfighter now.”

The list of priority technology areas is meant to be updated over time, he noted.

“This is a living list, it’s an evolving list. You know these technology areas are not going to be static. I mean, Level 1 will probably not change for a while, but the Level 2 and Level 3 … will and should be regularly updated in order for it to be useful to industry partners,” Frank said.

The post Navy CTO unveils list of priority areas for tech investment appeared first on DefenseScoop.

The upcoming RPP will be for the open centralized unit distributed unit (OCUDU) project.

“What Linux did for breaking open the internet and what Kubernetes did for allowing us access to cloud, we need to have the same kind of transformative technology for wireless communications,” Tom Rondeau, head of the Pentagon’s FutureG Office, said Thursday at the AITalks conference, presented by AIScoop.

“As wireless communications 5G is advancing, it is becoming a key part of the solution to future technologies. [As] future AI- and ML-based technologies are integrated with the network, how do we get that data from the edge and how do we understand the world around us? How do we pull that back? All that has to be opened up so that the innovation cycles will continue,” he said.

Rondeau noted that the DOD wants to work with the commercial sector as it looks to meet its own niche needs.

“How do we actually program these systems? How do we actually access the internals of them? And how do we advance and innovate rapidly to meet those rapid changes in the battlefield conditions today? We need to open up these systems, break them open,” he said.

The OCUDU project aims to deliver defense-unique capabilities on a “commercially sustainable” platform, according to Rondeau’s slide presentation. The aim is to reduce acquisition costs and push new capabilities to the field.

The Pentagon wants systems that are secure, resilient, AI-driven, ubiquitous, interoperable, cost-effective, customizable and “transparent.”

The FutureG Office is partnering with the National Spectrum Consortium to host an industry day, slated for May 7, to brief vendors on the OCUDU effort, according to Rondeau.

Officials want to “make sure that the entire industry knows what we’re doing here, why we’re doing it, why we think this provides that secure, robust, cost-effective, innovation solution for using 6G technologies in the battlefield,” Rondeau said.

A request for prototype proposals will likely come out in June, he said, and an award is estimated for the August-September time frame.

“What we’re really going for here is a carrier-grade cellular solution that is based on open-source technologies. We’re going to get that started and rolling in the next fiscal year, and that’s going to be a major effort that we’re going to be pursuing across the Defense Department and with commercial industry. We’re going to set this up for future commercial success so we can continue to take advantage” of those capabilities, Rondeau said.

The post Pentagon’s FutureG Office gearing up for new prototyping effort appeared first on DefenseScoop.

In December 2024, the DOD’s Office of the Chief Information Officer published a solicitation for the Advanced Dynamic Spectrum Sharing Demonstration, which called for industry technology that could allow the Pentagon and private sector to simultaneously use the same spectrum band. The department is currently evaluating proposals for source selection and intends to conduct the demonstration in November 2025, Tom Rondeau, principal director for the FutureG office, said Wednesday.

“We’re focused on the lower 3 GHz band. … It is a very difficult band for DOD. We have dozens of types of systems — hundreds of systems total — that operate in that lower 3 Ghz band,” Rondeau said during a panel at the Apex Defense Conference. “How do we share that? How can we do that with commercial success? Because that is important too, … but we can’t do it at the cost of national security.”

The demonstration comes following years of back-and-forth between the Defense Department and the commercial telecommunications industry over access to the 3.1-3.45 GHz S-band used by the Pentagon to operate different radars, weapons and other electronic systems. However, the telecom industry wants part of that spectrum to meet rising demand for commercial and civil 5G wireless technology.

While the debate over spectrum access has been going on for decades, lawmakers and Pentagon officials have recently expressed concerns that auctioning off parts of the spectrum to industry could hamper President Donald Trump’s homeland missile defense project known as Golden Dome.

After a congressionally mandated study determined that it’s possible for the Pentagon and industry to share the lower 3 GHz band of the spectrum, the Biden administration’s 2023 National Spectrum Strategy called for additional analysis into dynamic spectrum-sharing operations. 

According to the department’s RFP for this year’s demonstration, the results of the event will help inform the follow-on study requested by the National Spectrum Strategy.

“The goal of this effort is to show how advancements in one or more of the key spectrum-sharing enablers can achieve the overall objective of proving the viability of spectrum sharing in the 3100-3450 MHz band,” the RFP stated.

The experiment will be coordinated in partnership between the Pentagon and the National Spectrum Consortium, which represents hundreds of industry and academia organizations working on spectrum-related issues, as well as other federal agencies.

The department has conducted a number of experiments on dynamic spectrum-sharing operations in the past, but Rondeau noted that the November demonstration will be the first of its kind in terms of size and scale.

“The real gap that we’ve had in these past spectrum-sharing projects has been scale. They’ve been, frankly, under-resourced concepts on a table, maybe in a lab, maybe one or two outdoor experiments here and there. But nothing at this scale, which is a large-scale, multi-domain spectrum-sharing demonstration,” he said.

The post DOD preparing for first large-scale demonstration of spectrum-sharing tech in 2025 appeared first on DefenseScoop.

The DOD is looking to the next-generation wireless tech to further build on the improved speeds, latency and capacity it gained with 5G and support the U.S. military’s use of new capabilities at the edge.

With that, Macklin said the Pentagon is beginning to experiment with 6G in a variety of ways.

“6G will introduce some new features that some of the community are aware of, but I don’t think all fully appreciate the implications of that,” Macklin said at Elastic’s Public Sector Summit, produced by FedScoop.

As an example, the FutureG Office has been experimenting with a concept called Integrated Sensing and Communication, which uses radio frequencies of all objects — including those not actively transmitting data — connected to a network to create situational awareness of the surrounding environment, according to Macklin.

“So as these RF signals are going out there, moving from radio towers connecting to our devices, they transmit our voice data … they transmit data as our devices connect to the internet. But as those RF signals are bouncing around the environment, they can also paint a picture of what’s going on in that environment,” he explained.

One way in which the U.S. military could apply this emerging concept is to improve awareness and management of drones in a given environment, Macklin said.

“We’ve got a lot of drone delivery businesses that will expand their operations, right? So where we understand the standards are currently heading with that is drone swarm control, drone deconfliction, and then also drone detection,” he said.

Macklin continued: “If you’ve been tracking what’s been going on in the news recently, when you add a national security perspective to that, we sure have had a lot of incidents where folks who are weaponizing commercial drones. So I think your imagination can run pretty fast with why that is important, why we need to lead innovation in that area.”

Late last year, the Defense Department expressed frustration when it couldn’t figure out who was responsible for flying drones near military installations in New Jersey. But a new capability like Integrated Sensing and Communication supported by 6G might aid in addressing such incidents with threatening drones, Macklin implied.

And, because of existing investments in 5G wireless technology, fielding 6G shouldn’t come with a huge price tag in terms of supporting infrastructure.

A capability like Integrated Sensing and Communication “will be integrated into existing digital infrastructure. You don’t need to add a lot of new equipment. You can provide new capabilities out of existing infrastructure,” Macklin said.

As the Pentagon continues its efforts to explore and adopt next-generation wireless technologies like 6G, Macklin said it’s participating in a “whole-of-government approach” that allows modularity and interoperability called Open Radio Access Network, or Open RAN. He called it “our big play to drive innovation within the U.S. and with other stakeholders.”

In November, the department awarded Hughes Network Systems a $6.5 million contract to develop an Open RAN prototype at Fort Bliss, Texas, to test and evaluate advanced wireless capabilities for military applications. The capability was expected to offer “increased functionality and scalability of 5G wireless networks, incorporation of artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) into DoD systems, and greater flexibility in acquiring or replacing the software and hardware used in military equipment,” the department stated in a press release.

The post DOD turns its focus to 6G with concept that could help sense drones appeared first on DefenseScoop.

Communist China is especially dangerous because, unlike other adversaries, it is able to compete with and potentially surpass the United States economically. Many of my colleagues in Congress have appropriately pointed out the urgency with which the United States needs to modernize our economy with the most state-of-the-art technology, a key component of which is building out a robust 5G telecommunications infrastructure. Information flow is increasingly central to our highly digitized economy, and the importance of a modern, optimized 5G telecommunications network is vital. I agree with my colleagues that we need to dominate next-generation wireless technologies to stay ahead of our adversaries and advance strong economic growth. Economic power is military power — just ask the totalitarian adversaries the United States has left on the dust heap of history.

You will find no disagreement in the halls of Congress on the importance of building out America’s 5G infrastructure. Many are frustrated with the slow pace at which the Federal Communications Commission and Congress have been moving to restore spectrum auction authority and open up more spectrum bands for commercial use. Unfortunately, when it comes to how to reach that goal, some are willing to sell Department of Defense (DOD) capabilities for short term economic gain. This would be just as disastrous to our national security in the long run as not developing our 5G networks. 

Many of our military’s most important radar systems operate on the 3.1-3.45 gigahertz (GHz) band of the spectrum, referred to as the lower-3 band. These radars are essential to homeland defense missions and protecting our troops overseas. Right now, Arleigh Burke-class destroyers are conducting missile defense missions off the coasts of the United States and protecting our deployed forces in the Red Sea against sophisticated Houthi missile and drone attacks. The Navy’s Aegis Combat System relies heavily on the lower-3 band, using radars to track threats and guide weapons to targets. Forcing the DOD to vacate or share those portions of the spectrum would cost taxpayers dearly — the Navy alone estimates that it would cost them $250 billion to migrate their systems to other bands of the spectrum, and that would take time we do not have with the looming threat of a belligerent Communist China.

Furthermore, on January 27, 2025, President Trump issued a potentially game changing Executive Order directing the DOD to develop and build an “Iron Dome Missile Defense Shield for America.” Before the Senate Armed Services Committee this month, General Guillot, the Commander of Northern Command charged with protecting our homeland, confirmed that NORTHCOM needs unfettered access to portions of the spectrum, and that any Iron Dome for America concept is dead on arrival if the DOD has to vacate the lower-3 band and other crucial portions of the spectrum. In short, the binary choice many in the telecommunications industry are lobbying Congress to make would kill President Trump’s Iron Dome for America and continue to leave the U.S. homeland exposed to an array of long-range strike threats ranging from intercontinental ballistic missiles to cruise missiles to hypersonic weapons. The American people should not accept this. I agree with President Trump’s vision, and therefore want to safeguard the DOD spectrum necessary for developing and deploying an Iron Dome for America, ranging from point defense up to a space-based layer.

Advocates for restricting DOD’s use of the lower-3 band or portions of the 7 and 8 GHz band of spectrum argue that Communist China has been willing to build out some of their 5G infrastructure on those bands. However, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can arbitrarily turn off or blow out commercial use and infrastructure of any portion of the spectrum whenever they want with no recourse for civilian users, and provide their military primacy in spectrum use. Certainly, that is not a situation the U.S. telecommunications industry is interested in.

The telecommunications industry should abandon its quest to restrict the DOD’s use of the lower-3 band or require it to share all or a portion of the band — a course of action which would materially damage the national security of the United States. The DOD has developed exquisite radars on this portion of the spectrum precisely because of the unique physics there which enable them to function so effectively. There is a reason the CCP is actively advocating that other countries around the world build out their 5G infrastructure on the lower-3 band. It is to limit the capabilities of our most capable radars.

The twofold path forward must be (1) an aggressive pursuit of spectrum sharing technology for use throughout the spectrum (not just the critical lower-3 band), and (2) a thorough and candid assessment of what portion, if any, of the 7 and 8 GHz band of spectrum can be auctioned off to industry without harming national security. From there, Congress can give the spectrum auction authority necessary. This should happen quickly as 5G expansion remains a priority.  

As the United States engages in this competition with Communist China with a renewed vigor under the Trump administration, it is imperative that we not trade national security for economic prosperity. Now is not the time to degrade our military capabilities, especially those capabilities needed to defend our homeland from attack. We never want to send our troops into a fair fight. We want to give them every possible advantage to prevail with minimum losses. That includes crucial bands of the electromagnetic spectrum. I look forward to working with my colleagues to find a solution to the ever-increasing demand for spectrum usage, while acknowledging our need to restrict certain portions for national security.

Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., is a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, chair of the SASC Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, and also serves on the SASC Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities and the SASC Subcommittee on Strategic Forces.

The post Protection of spectrum by Congress also protects Trump’s Iron Dome from shortsighted 5G policy appeared first on DefenseScoop.

The force, part of Marine Air Control Group 38, participated in Steel Knight 24, an exercise at Camp Pendleton, California, where they used a 5G system to remote into a AN/TPS-80 Ground/Air Task-Oriented Radar for its multifunction air operations center, which includes the air controllers and air defenders serving as the sensor to coordinate aircraft in the tactical battlespace. It must be expeditionary in case troops have to pick up and move.

That event was the culmination of nearly four years of work, in part, evaluating how the Marines can incorporate 5G into tactical formations.

Using capabilities provided by the Marine Corps Tactical Systems Support Activity, the unit at Steel Knight sought to demonstrate the ability to keep the radar a significant distance away to prove they can keep the radar survivable — because once it’s turned on, it can be targeted by the enemy, along with any forces operating close by — and provide another means of transport to ensure data gets to the air ops center.

In the past, the control group was able to successfully remote into the radar via satellite communications, officials said, but now they’re demonstrating that can be done through the terrestrial layer with a high bandwidth communications system like a 5G radio.

Looking to the future

The Marine Corps is excited about what 5G capabilities can bring to the force. They promise to enhance concepts that the service and the larger Defense Department enterprise are pursuing.

For the Corps, 5G technologies are poised to bolster its “stand-in force” mentality — which requires forces to already be present in theater near the enemy before crisis or conflict breaks out — along with Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations, which involves mobile, low-signature units that can operate in austere areas temporarily and move from location to location. All of this fits into the larger Force Design concept, an annually updated vision to modernize the Corps.

These are also all in concert with the DOD’s Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control concept, which envisions how systems across the entire battlespace from all the services and key international partners could be more effectively and holistically networked to provide the right data to commanders, faster.

Future operating environments will demand that forces be smaller, more dispersed, nimble and have low electromagnetic signatures. This means units must not have a lot of equipment, and communications gear needs to be intuitive — allowing them to move quickly to avoid being targeted and be resilient in the face of unforeseen technical difficulties or enemy jamming.

“When you go into an expeditionary environment, the rules change a little bit and [commercial off-the-shelf] hardware can certainly still be applicable. But when your focus is, in an EABO context, really flexible, [the] Marine Corp ethos of shoot, move and communicate, you have to be able to move quickly. Stand-in forces that are supposed to be small, highly mobile, lethal, self-sustaining, they need a network that can move with them and support that same type capability,” said Lt. Col. Benjamin Pimentel, who is on detail from the Combat Development and Integration directorate to the FutureG office within the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, where he serves as the director of advanced component development and prototypes.

“We think that a 5G architecture, moving into 6G, can really help support that. Certainly not a silver bullet. There is no silver bullet, but we think it can be a larger part of DOD’s overarching concept of Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control,” he said in an interview.

Members of Control Group 38 explained that the technologies tested at Steel Knight could improve the way they operate if brought to fruition.

5G capabilities provide additional transport options for units that will likely be operating in denied environments, meaning if satellite communications are unavailable, this is one more path they can use.

They can also allow units to operate more dispersed — both from each other and assets such as radars that put units at risk given they are easily targetable — making them more mobile and easier to move equipment.

The radar “can be a significant distance away, but now we’re not going to have the dependency on the Marine to actually run that fire line a significant distance away. It makes picking up and moving more appetizing,” Maj Anthony Johnson, operations officer within the control group, said in an interview. “If we could have this capability right now, I think that what the value proposition for our service is that we can essentially have two teams instead of just one conglomerate of Marines in one location … You just put that in the perspective of command-and-control systems … The radar, you can stow it or you can emit, but as soon as you get the target quality tracks, you can pick up and move that radar while still having that air operation center remain in place. Or the inverse of that, the air operation center can displace while the radar is still in place and you won’t lose connectivity.”

Steel Knight also demonstrated the ability to use 5G to support autonomous platforms leveraging the high throughput of the network. This allowed the units to send full-motion video back that could be analyzed by algorithms to enable automatic object recognition, target detection and target tracking.

This was an important demonstration because the technology could eventually keep more Marines away from the front lines if they can rely on reliable sensors to provide the information they need rather than risking the lives and resources of humans.

“In a stand-in force context where I want to be lethal, mobile, lightweight and self-sustaining, if I can reduce the number of Marines that I need to send forward because … I can limit that number [of force protection capabilities] through autonomy, I don’t have to have Marines on posts all the time,” Pimentel said. “I can have them somewhat centralized, like a [quick reaction force], and when the autonomy cues me that there might be a threat based on what it’s looking for and you can deploy those [thereby] reducing the number of Marines on a stand-in force through manned-unmanned teaming, I think is the capability that you need in a high-speed network to support. 5G is able to do that.”

Hiding in plain sight

Using 5G technologies will also allow troops to digitally camouflage themselves against the enemy, according to officials, a key lesson coming from Ukraine’s war with Russia.

Unlike the post-9/11 conflicts against a technologically inferior enemy, future operations in the electromagnetic spectrum will be fraught. Any time a radio is pushed, a radar turned on, a digital device used, it emits a unique electronic signature within the spectrum. Advanced adversaries have spectrum analyzers to tell them what the device is and physically where it’s located on the battlefield, allowing them to either jam it or fire munitions on its position, potentially killing the troops in proximity.

Leveraging 5G capabilities, which are ubiquitous in most of the world — and with the right security protections in place — can allow units to literally hide in plain sight.

“If you get within 10 kilometers of the front, they [Ukrainians] use green gear or programs-of-record radios that have been provided to them by the United States or whatever they have organically to them. But in reading some interviews and some things on at a higher classification, using those radios can often put you at a disadvantage because they give off very specific waveforms. They [the Russians] know if someone is using it, that streams important person, target them immediately,” Chief Warrant Officer 2 Kelsen Epperson, space and propagation engineering officer with the control group, said in an interview. “Cellular is so ubiquitous, it’s proliferated, everybody has it, it’s everywhere, it’s hard to tell who’s who and who’s what.”

The Marine Corps is testing private 5G capabilities, meaning troops have to bring their own routers, as opposed to plugging into a foreign nation’s infrastructure, which, according to some, can be dangerous if it’s a non-permissive environment given the host nation has access and can easily intercept communications.

Within the EABO context, where forces will be operating in remote regions, they will absolutely have to bring their own equipment.

In the future, however, the Marines aren’t ruling out the possibility of leveraging host nation infrastructure if the right security protocols are put in place.

“In places where existing 5G networks are provided by the host nation, we think that there are ways that you can leverage that, and doing so in a secure manner is a large thrust within our office. The same way that when we go to other countries, there’s a road that’s already there, I’m going to drive on it. There’s a bridge that’s already there and it meets my requirement, drive over it. I’m not going to expend the resources to create my own bridge further across the water feature or build my own road if I don’t need to,” Pimental said. “Insofar as we can use [existing 5G] in a way that meets mission requirements with an operational security perspective, we absolutely want to do that.”

One example from Ukraine that officials described was how units were discovered by the Russians because they were using the same devices each time when attacking positions. The Russians eventually caught on.

The counter was to start provisioning SIM cards. Each time troops would walk into an operations center, they would drop their old SIM cards and pick up new ones with new numbers and country codes. This means they could use the same device but from a signature perspective, that device was never in the same place twice. As a result, neither side has interest in jamming those signals because they would then be jamming the ones that their forces are using as well. Marine Corps officials noted there is inherent survivability from hiding in plain sight.

Plugging into host infrastructure also helps with spectrum deconfliction, Pimentel noted. The spectrum is a finite resource and portions of it must be allocated for certain uses and frequencies. But if one is already a user within that existing infrastructure as opposed to bringing their own capability, they’re already licensed under that country’s laws and regulations, effectively sidestepping that process.

Training and resourcing

Officials acknowledged that especially in the private 5G context, there’s additional equipment that forces will need to procure, carry, set up and be trained on. But, over the long run, those technologies and others as part of overall commercial 5G are easier to use and maintain, which could lead to cost savings.

“The total cost of ownership argument is something that we try to focus on, because you can imagine an initial hardware purchase to run one of these networks could be higher versus a sustained program of record that’s already going,” Pimentel said. “However, I think when you consider the cost of a handset, the phone that you probably have with you right now, versus a tactical radio, there’s a significant price differential between those two.”

He noted that if the Corps begins to shift to leveraging more commercial devices for communication, such as 5G-enabled cellular devices, those are cheaper and more expendable than exquisite military radios.

“While you might look at initial price tag that was way more expensive, total cost of ownership is likely in the long run, cheaper. You may take a dip in the red to find yourself back in the black after a number of years once you’re in sustainment because, I’d argue, it’s never the initial purchase price that gets you, it’s the carrying cost that gets you over the lifetime of the program,” he said. A cellular device “is almost an expendable versus how expensive some of our other platforms are, then you start to shift more to the same type of attritable system mindset that the department is taking through large initiatives like Replicator.”

The adaptability of these networks makes them an attractive capability. Especially now that commercial providers have begun to enable direct to cell from satellite like iPhones’ new satellite communications SOS function, if cellular is unavailable.

“Global ubiquitous coverage is something DOD has always wanted, and commercial wireless is now starting to provide it,” Pimentel said. “If I’m only taking a phone forward and that’s what I’m paying for, plus the subscription costs and then the same back end services … that I was already paying for anyway, I think you can see a significant cost reduction.”

Taking advantage of this type of model also reduces training burdens. Most Marines today grew up using smartphones. They’re intuitive and don’t come with lengthy training manuals. That means less time and resources required in the training pipeline to get forces up to speed on exquisite systems.

“In the future, what we’re trying to demonstrate to the service, but also just the DOD writ large, is that Marines are capable, they’re eager to learn and they’re excited to employ something that is significantly more capable than what we currently have,” Johnson said.

The post Marine Corps tests tactical 5G, looks at wider adoption for communications appeared first on DefenseScoop.

The review will launch as the Pentagon is moving to modernize its communications and data transport capabilities and implement warfighting concepts like Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control.

“We’re kicking off a study soon on non-terrestrial networking protocol. And I think that’s going to really allow us to take the scalability, the network management agility of 5G and really push that across a lot of our communications architecture,” Mike Dean, director for C3 infrastructure in the office of the DOD Chief Information Officer, said Thursday during a panel at the Potomac Officers Club’s annual Defense R&D Summit in Northern Virginia.

The NTN examination, which is slated to begin in a few weeks, will include officials from across the department as well as engagement with industry, according to Dean.

“It’s a kind of an internal look in the DOD, across the DoD, [with] a lot of stakeholders. And it’s both with industry and our DOD mil [departments] and agencies,” he told DefenseScoop at the conference. “We’re just trying to get a sense of where they are and where they’re headed, so we can set policy and resources.”

The Pentagon is pursuing new satellite systems, drones and other airborne platforms to help move data and better link U.S. military forces and key allies and partners.

The plan for the upcoming study is to “do industry engagement, bring those folks in, start saying, ‘What kind of capabilities do you have? What are you working on?’ So that we can look long term and say, ‘How do I set the requirements, how do I set the resources, and how do I set the architecture and policy?’” Dean remarked. “Because what we don’t want to do is be in a situation where we have Tetris, we have all these solutions coming in, and now we’re trying to mix and match. And having that framework in place allows us to do it quicker.”

DOD has a variety of initiatives underway that are expected to boost non-terrestrial networking. For example, the Space Development Agency is moving forward with plans to build out a massive constellation of hundreds of satellites in low-Earth orbit known as the Proliferated Warfighter Space Architecture for data transport and missile tracking.

The Pentagon is also working to onboard new wireless tech with 5G and “FutureG” initiatives.

These efforts are intended to help the military communicate faster and manage data more effectively.

“One of the things we’re excited about when you look at taking satellite communications from [geostationary orbit] all the way down to LEO and not GEO, [is] you’re able to … decrease latency, increase throughput. And that’s the kind of advantage you [also] get from 5G. So we think if you pair those two, that’s going to be pretty powerful, particularly as you’re trying to track” forces that are forward deployed and keep up with “the pace of battle,” Dean said.

The post Pentagon to launch new study focused on non-terrestrial networks and protocols appeared first on DefenseScoop.

Under the contract, Hughes will install 5G O-RAN equipment at the base that will operate a temporary network for preliminary evaluation, according to a press release. The network will eventually transition to the company’s commercial network in order to support both Pentagon and commercial customers in and around the military installation.

The project will be a joint effort between the Army, the Pentagon’s Chief Information Officer (CIO) and the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, the release noted.

“The Open RAN project at Fort Bliss is a valuable opportunity for the DoD to explore the enhanced command and control capabilities that near-real time control of the RAN offers DoD,” Anthony Smith, acting DOD CIO for command, control and communications, said in a statement. “The DoD CIO will continue to prioritize the deployment of Open RAN architectures and 5G across the Department, leveraging these information communications technologies for strategic warfighter advantage.”

Advancing 5G communications capabilities for military applications has been a key priority for the Pentagon’s FutureG office in recent years, specifically via O-RAN technology. While current radio access networks use standalone hardware and software platforms, O-RAN is a multi-vendor solution that separates the software and hardware and allows for different vendors to simultaneously operate on the same network.

The capability would offer “increased functionality and scalability of 5G wireless networks, incorporation of artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) into DoD systems, and greater flexibility in acquiring or replacing the software and hardware used in military equipment,” a department press release stated.

The project at Fort Bliss will serve as the testing ground for development of a RAN Intelligent Controller (RIC) — a software component that optimizes the radio access network. The effort is expected to lay foundations for O-RAN installation at other military locations, while also establishing a training site for staff.

“The primary use case that the Fort Bliss prototype will test through the RIC is the ability to rapidly change spectrum at the 5G control node, a capability that has real world relevance to resilient communications for a mobile command post,” per the release.

The new prototype effort follows a number of O-RAN technology pilots kickstarted by the Pentagon’s FutureG office in 2023, which allowed the department to work with companies and understand how open networks and software approaches can improve communication capabilities for warfighters.

Hughes has previously worked with the Defense Department in advancing wireless technology for service members. The company received a contract in 2022 to deploy a standalone 5G network at the Naval Air Station Whidbey Island in Washington, which established the first 5G O-RAN network at a U.S. military base, according to Hughes. In 2024, Hughes received a follow-on extension contract to continue 5G deployment at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii.

The post Pentagon taps Hughes to develop 5G O-RAN prototype at Fort Bliss appeared first on DefenseScoop.

The office, which is in charge of research-and-development efforts for advanced wireless network capabilities, has three projects underway in its “Beyond 5G” portfolio that it plans to carry out through at least fiscal 2025. Collectively, the programs aim to enhance the Pentagon’s ability to connect and maneuver within the electromagnetic spectrum, Tom Rondeau, principal director for FutureG at the Pentagon, told DefenseScoop.

“We have more readily available access to spectrum than we ever have, and it keeps increasing. So our ability to maneuver within the spectrum from a single system keeps advancing,” Rondeau said in a recent interview on the sidelines of NDIA’s Emerging Technologies for Defense Conference and Exhibition.

Future generations of wireless communications will use higher frequencies on the spectrum than their predecessors, therefore providing faster connections with lower latency compared to 5G and others. The tech is also expected to be highly scalable, allowing for devices to use multiple connections simultaneously — meaning they can stay online even if one network source is interrupted or interfered with.

The Beyond 5G portfolio largely focuses on R&D to leverage these advancements for military applications. The Office of the Secretary of Defense requested $55.1 million in fiscal 2024 to fund the portfolio’s work — including the three applied research projects.

One of those efforts is to develop a Unlimited Software-defined Radio that isn’t bound by hardware and previous generations’ architecture and implementation constraints. The capability will let users leverage any part of the spectrum with any waveform, improving overall spectrum management capabilities, Rondeau said.

“Spectrum is a maneuver space, and so we need to be able to take advantage of that,” he said. “We still think of spectrum and warfighting in terms of, ‘What channel are you on?’ … We really need to be flexible and maneuverable around all these.”

Once warfighters have access to more spectrum, they’ll need to easily navigate the network without worrying about whether or not they’re on the right communications channel. Rondeau explained that another research project — Hyper-dimensional Software-defined Networks — will enable autonomous optimization of wireless network operations to solve the problem.

“The network needs to tell the system what to do,” he said, adding that the technology will “be able to understand not what your radio needs to do, but what everyone needs to do. And so, how do I look across this from the different physical access that we have, the geometries of where you’re at?”

It’s a multidimensional problem that requires the FutureG office to consider how both terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks can optimize across several domains at once, he noted. 

Speaking during a panel discussion at the NDIA conference, Rondeau emphasized that non-terrestrial networks — including satellite constellations and airborne platforms — are key to providing warfighters with ubiquitous, secure and instant communications in austere environments.

“It’s not just satellite constellations, it’s not just the proliferated [low-Earth orbit] concepts — it’s all the layers above us,” Rondeau said. “It can be [unmanned aerial vehicles] enabling these systems, or high-altitude platforms and balloons that might be able to be subset systems to pLEO all the way up to [geosynchronous orbit] as part of our hybrid access to infrastructure.”

The third research project underway at the FutureG office is development of Mobile Internet Protocol advancements so that new systems can integrate with the rest of the network, Rondeau told DefenseScoop.

Traditional internet protocols were created for legacy devices that are designed to be plugged into fixed sites, such as computers. Even mobile phones that roam across coverage areas are connected to a centralized cellular network that works to manage how a device stays connected, he explained.

Therefore, the FutureG office is trying to understand “the next generation of internet protocol that is fundamentally rooted in mobility,” as well as how it should be managed, Rondeau said.

Overall, the three projects represent a hard engineering and technical problem for the FutureG office, especially as it looks to scale capabilities across the entire Defense Department.

“When you’re talking about what waveform to use, what frequency to use [and] power consumption, … if you’re trying to optimize all these simultaneously, they’re actually competing goals,” he explained. “Then, as you’re trying to do this across multiple — maybe hundreds of thousands — of radio systems in the future, all operating in the battlefield, now you’re trying to schedule who gets what, when, what resources go to what place and all these things.”

Another challenge is the unstable fiscal environment that has plagued the Defense Department and other federal agencies in recent years, in addition to a lack of transparency from the White House and Congress regarding potential funding cuts, he said. Uncertainty in the budgetary decisions could lead the FutureG office into a more conservative approach to how it spends money, which in turn could stifle the advancement and delivery of new technologies, he added.

In OSD’s budget request for FY ’25, the Beyond 5G portfolio would receive $38.5 million — $16.6 million less than the previous year’s request. According to budget documents, the decrease was due to “a directed reduction that was applied to meet DOD overall funding benchmarks.” 

If approved by lawmakers, the 2025 funding would go towards continued development of the office’s ongoing programs, as well as adding new projects focused on contested logistics, open-source software solutions and multi-site FutureG experimentation, the documents stated.

“If they’re going to cut my budget, then tell me about it. Don’t surprise us. And if it’s a non-starter to crawl back the budget, at least I’ve got time to properly plan,” Rondeau said. “It’s that level of uncertainty that prevents us from really creating a space for the innovation that I need.”

The post Beyond 5G: Pentagon sets sights on next-generation wireless tech with new projects appeared first on DefenseScoop.